Search blog.co.uk

Citizen Review of Police: Approaches & Implementation

by criminal-justice @ 2008-05-16 - 07:16:19

In many communities in the United States, residents participate to some degree in overseeing their local law enforcement agencies. The degree varies. The most active citizen oversight boards investigate allegations of police misconduct and recommend actions to the chief or sheriff. Other citizen boards review the findings of internal police investigations and recommend that the chief or sheriff approve or reject the findings. In still others, an auditor investigates the process by which the police or sheriff's department accept or investigate complaints and reports to the department and the public on the thoroughness and fairness of the process. Citizen oversight systems, originally designed to temper police discretion in the1950s, have steadily grown in number through the 1990s. But determining theproper role has a troubled history. This publication is intended to help citizens, law enforcement officers and executives, union leaders, and public interest groups understand the advantages and disadvantages of various oversight systems and components. In describing the operation of nine very different approaches to citizen oversight, the authors do not extol or disparage citizen oversight but rather try to help jurisdictions interested in creating a new or enhancing an existing oversight system by: Describing the types of citizen oversight. Presenting programmatic information from various jurisdictions with existingcitizen oversight systems. Examining the social and monetary benefits and costs of different systems. The report also addresses staffing; examines ways to resolve potential conflictsbetween oversight bodies and police; and explores monitoring, evaluation, andfunding concerns. No one system works best for everyone. Communities must take responsibility for fashioning a system that fits their local situation and unique needs. Ultimately, the author notes, the talent, fairness, dedication, and flexibility of the keyparticipants are more important to the procedure's success than is the system's

structure.

 

READ ON

http://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles1/nij/184430.txt


 
 

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks:

No Comments/Trackbacks for this post yet...

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
All comments on this blog will be moderated by the author.
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.